Cases 51 - 60 of 61
CABRERA v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv04766
Plaintiff:
HECTOR M. CABRERA
Defendant:
CARTER, JONES, RAINEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANG v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2010cv01521
Plaintiff:
Chase M. Rang
Defendant:
Chapman and Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANG v. CHAPMAN et al
as 2:2010cv03082
Plaintiff:
CHASE M. RANG
Defendant:
CHAPMAN and FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2010cv01174
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Daniel Malick, Bruce Hauslyak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv00235
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY A. BEARD, TIMOTHY I. MARK and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER et al v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT et al
as 2:2009cv05336
Plaintiff:
LORENZO OLIVER, EDWARD SALERNO, DOUGLAS MINATEE and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, DR. MERRIL MAIN, CLERKE BRUNO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Chapman
as 1:2009cv00713
Petitioner:
Janet Skains Johnson
Respondent:
Elaine Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jan v. Chapman
as 1:2009cv00562
Petitioner:
Anita Jan
Respondent:
Elaine Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HANKINS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JEFFREY BEARD, CINDY G. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PRIDGEON v. LOGAN et al
as 3:2009cv00964
Plaintiff:
RICKY PRIDGEON
Defendant:
SHELLY LOGAN, ELAINE LESCHOT, RICHARD CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
