Cases 51 - 60 of 179
BULLARD et al v. WHITTEAKER et al
as 2:2019cv01062
Defendant:
MAY, AGENT DIUITTIS, DELANEY and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL IDEEN and JAMES FOY BULLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. ROWE et al
as 1:2019cv06757
Defendant:
MARK ROWE, VINELAND MUNICIPAL COURT and VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv00668
Plaintiff:
KEVINO GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GRAHAM v. CLARK et al
as 2:2018cv01411
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MICHAEL CLARK and WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Petitioner:
PAUL R. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAHAM v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2018cv03686
Petitioner:
SHAROD GRAHAM
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, M.D. OVERMYER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pollard v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2018cv01381
Defendant:
Speck, Lt., C.O. Anderson, C.O. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley M Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villatoro v. Ferguson et al
as 3:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Louis Alonso Villatoro
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Bobbi Jo Salamon, Jennifer Rossman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Graham v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 17-3660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS LEE GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Robert Graham v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 17-3610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
GRAHAM v. MARLER
as 2:2017cv04838
Petitioner:
KEVINO GRAHAM
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
