Cases 51 - 60 of 215
GLENN v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv03802
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GLENN
Defendant:
STEVE JOHNSON, GARY LANIGAN, ROBERT ROYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dortch v. Sabol et al
as 3:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Frank Dortch
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, York County Prison, Prime Care Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gee v. Sabol et al
as 3:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
David Gee
Defendant:
Mary Sabol, Valquez, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY et al v. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv06541
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY, MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA and PA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CENTRE COUNTY'S COURTHOUSE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF CENTRE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAZUMOV et al v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv09221
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RAZUMOV and MARIA RAZUMOV
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMONS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv09046
Plaintiff:
GLENN C. CLEMONS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEADEN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07446
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GLENN HEADEN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07176
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GLENN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. SANNA et al
as 3:2016cv06560
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. SAUNDERS
Defendant:
RONALD J. SANNA, AARON AUCLAIR, JOHN WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard Carter v. Kathleen Kane, et al
as 16-3731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE, BRIAN COLEMAN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
