Cases 51 - 60 of 273
Risher v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2017cv01659
Plaintiff:
David L. Risher
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Vincent E. Mooney and Stanley Stanish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Bailey v. Renee Foulds, et al
as 17-2844
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
RENEE FOULDS, BRAD RITCHEY, HOPWOOD, CO and others
ROSADO v. JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN) et al
as 1:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO FRATICELLI ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JANE DOE (LAW LIBRIAN), MOONEY, GOYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OCASIO-SANTANA v. MOONEY et al
as 5:2017cv03168
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEAL OCASIO-SANTANA
Respondent:
MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Foulds et al
as 3:2017cv01166
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
Renee Foulds, Brad Ritchey, Hopwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRITTINGHAM v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv02907
Plaintiff:
TRACY BRITTINGHAM
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , MOONEY , JOSEPH MATALONI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAZQUEZ v. MOONEY et al
as 2:2017cv02868
Petitioner:
NELSON VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YORK v. MOONEY et al
as 5:2017cv02535
Petitioner:
MEDFORD EUGENE YORK, JR.
Respondent:
MOONEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sears v. McCoy et al
as 1:2017cv00869
Plaintiff:
Richard Sears
Defendant:
Donte McCoy, A. Peters, J. Eveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricciardi v. Schumencky et al
as 1:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Ricciardi
Defendant:
Schumencky, Woods, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
