Cases 51 - 60 of 5,673
ALLISON v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SCOTT ALLISON
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SAMUEL DUNKLE, WARDEN BLAIR COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Desmoulin v. USP-Lewisburg
as 1:2024cv00930
Petitioner:
Lester Desmoulin
Respondent:
Warden of USP-Lewisburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roldan v. Greene
as 3:2024cv00931
Petitioner:
Angel Roldan
Respondent:
Warden J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cooper et al v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn M Cooper, B.L.D.C. and Kaitlyn Cooper (Youmans)
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Warden Nicholas, ADA Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 4:2024cv00695
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Ricard
as 3:2024cv00921
Petitioner:
Mark Brown
Respondent:
Warden Ricard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Christensen
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Jesse Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
Rodriquez v. LSCI-Allenwood
as 3:2024cv00920
Petitioner:
Thomas Phillip Rodriquez
Respondent:
Warden of LSCI-Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Womack v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00658
Petitioner:
Christian Dior Womack
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
