Cases 51 - 60 of 68
WINTERS v. BURNS et al
as 5:2013cv03828
Petitioner:
SHAUN WINTERS
Respondent:
DANIEL BURNS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Allen v. PA Common Pleas Court, et al
as 12-3680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ERIC ALLEN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS COURT, ADA MR GENOVESE, PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSN, Norristown B. and others
Stephen Winters v. Louis Folino, et al
as 12-3111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN JOSEPH WINTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNION COUNTY
ALLEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2012cv02649
Plaintiff:
DAVID ERIC ALLEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMON PLEAS, COURT MONTGOMERY COUNTY, GENOVESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. BANIS et al
as 2:2011cv06800
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE JOHNSON
Defendant:
GREGORY BANIS, DONALD ASPER, NANCY WINTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MEMEGER et al
as 2:2011cv05922
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant:
ZANE DAVID MEMEGER, PETER F. SCHNECK, NANCY B. WINTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINTERS v. CFCF
as 2:2011cv05289
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO EMANUEL WINTERS
Defendant:
CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. BANIS et al
as 2:2011cv04981
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE JOHNSON
Defendant:
GREGORY BANIS, DONALD ASPER, NANCY WINTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. ASPER et al
as 2:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD ASPER, ROSELLI, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooke v. Wood et al
as 1:2010cv01014
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven P. Wood, Jerome O. Herlihy, Paul R. Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
