Cases 61 - 70 of 82
ROWE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv04094
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHN ROWE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS-PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
JAMES WALTER JEFFERSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawn Ball v. Famiglio, et al
as 12-3536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMIGLIO, HUMMEL, NEECE and others
Dawn Ball v. Famiglio, et al
as 12-1942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMIGLIO, HUMMEL, NEECE and others
Ball v. Famiglio et al
as 1:2011cv01834
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
Dr. Famiglio, Lt. Hummel, Neece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. THE UNITED STATES PENETENTIARY HERE IN LOUISBURG PENNSYLVANIA P.A.
as 2:2011cv04171
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ALIF ROWE
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES PENETENTIARY HERE IN LOUISBURG PENNSYLVANIA P.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2011cv04165
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. ROWE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRANT v. BALDWIN et al
as 5:2011cv03850
Plaintiff:
ROGEL GRANT
Defendant:
MARK BALDWIN, THERESA JOHNSON, PATRICT L. MEEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. (CFCF) CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv02483
Plaintiff:
RONALD ROWE
Defendant:
(CFCF) CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2010cv02456
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Rowe
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
