Cases 71 - 80 of 98
ALVES et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2013cv03894
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ALVES, THADDEUS THOMAS, RAFIEEK GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
BRUCE DAVIS, ANGEL SANTIAGO, ROBERT BUECHELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Aruanno v. John/Jane Does 1-10
as 13-1451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10, et al.
RODRIGUEZ v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07250
Plaintiff:
NOELIA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARUANNO v. JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
as 2:2012cv07694
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ARUANNO
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. WARDEN JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 1:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin Lindsay v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 12-1929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN X. LINDSAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
JON FISHER, BRIAN CORBIN, JOSEPH A. KELLER and others
CARTER v. DOW et al
as 3:2011cv06693
Plaintiff:
ROY L. CARTER
Defendant:
PAULA T. DOW, MATHEW BOGNER, THOMAS MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMUELS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2011cv05420
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SAMUELS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., GIORLA, DEP. COM. JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLETCHER v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv04214
Plaintiff:
TYJON FLETCHER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , NEW JERSEY NORTHERN STATE PRISON , GEORGE W. HAYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FARMER v. RIORDAN et al
as 2:2010cv05824
Plaintiff:
ALLEN J. FARMER
Defendant:
BRIAN RIORDAN, K. HOUSTON, JOHN & JANE DOE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
