Cases 71 - 80 of 181
FAUSTINO v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv05438
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO FAUSTINO
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TUNG v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2010cv05424
Petitioner:
JUNG TUNG
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Wahid Ali v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 10-3795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AL-WAHID ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, BEVERLY WEBER, Union County Jail, GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner, D.O.C. and others
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROCTOR v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv03878
Plaintiff:
SHARIF R. PROCTOR
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM MEDICAL STAFF EMPLOYEES, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UFELE v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv03440
Petitioner:
EMEKA F. UFELE
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., SCOTT WEBER and ROY HENDRICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHATTERGOON v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2010cv03402
Petitioner:
SAVITRI CHATTERGOON
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO, JOHN E. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAYNES v. WEBER et al
as 3:2010cv02777
Petitioner:
KEVIN HAYNES
Defendant:
SCOTT A. WEBER, ERIC HOLDER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
