Cases 71 - 80 of 85,189
Michael Romig v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. ROMIG
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Wayne Davis v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff:
WAYNE A. DAVIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY
HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
BOBBIE HENDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN, FCI & FCP MCKEAN and CMC ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SCOTT v. ICE et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Petitioner:
JAMIE A.D. SCOTT
Respondent:
ICE, COLETTE PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Andrews v. Talutto et al
as 4:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrews
Defendant:
Warden Talutto, Warden Pigga and Jason Lando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv05993
Petitioner:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson, Jr. v. Danfelt et al
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K. Danfelt, Dave Ernest, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06010
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOKES v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv06037
Petitioner:
BRAD STOKES
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MEARS v. CASALE et al
as 2:2024cv06008
Plaintiff:
KEITH MEARS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE N. CASALE, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
