Cases 81 - 90 of 115
NUNEZ v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2012cv07196
Petitioner:
FERNANDO NUNEZ
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEJIA-NUNEZ v. MEEKS
as 1:2012cv00269
Petitioner:
FREDESVINDO MEJIA-NUNEZ
Respondent:
BOBBY MEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MENDEZ NUNEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 3:2012cv06126
Petitioner:
OSCAR GARIBALDY MENDEZ NUNEZ
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nunez Mejia v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv01453
Petitioner:
Andres E. Nunez Mejia
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Thomas L Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jesus-Nunez v. USA
as 1:2012cv01216
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Edward Jesus-Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2011cv01506
Plaintiff:
ANGELO LENELL DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL HARLOW, DORINA VARNER, MR. LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2011cv04496
Plaintiff:
MARIANO NUNEZ
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ-TORRES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2011cv04142
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN NUNEZ-TORRES
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv03396
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMISON v. BEARD et al
as 3:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
DASHAWN L. JAMISON
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, RAYMOND SOBINA, J. BARRY JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
