Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 339
DICKSON v. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA POLICE HEAD QUARTERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00612
Plaintiff: JAMES ELIJAH DICKSON
Defendant: JOE SULLIVAN, SAM NEWHOUSE, WALTER PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Monroe County et al
as 3:2018cv00026
Plaintiff: Johnny E. Smith
Defendant: Monroe County, Monroe County Correctional Facility, Garry Haidel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARVIN v. PEREZ
as 2:2018cv00059
Petitioner: UMAR GARVIN
Respondent: MIA ROBERTS PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Larson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02341
Plaintiff: Joel Perez
Defendant: James J. Larson, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARVIN v. PEREZ
as 2:2017cv05641
Plaintiff: UMAR GARVIN
Defendant: MIA ROBERTS PEREZ, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv05320
Plaintiff: SALVADOR PEREZ
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez v. Mahally et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02117
Plaintiff: Anthony I Perez, Sr.
Defendant: Larry Mahally, Sowga, J H Dupont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ-CINTRON v. HARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00303
Plaintiff: YARED A. PEREZ-CINTRON
Defendant: ADAM HARDNER, BRIAN FIORELLI, KABASINKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PONCE-PEREZ v. SMITH
as 3:2017cv00166
Petitioner: MANUEL PONCE-PEREZ
Respondent: CHRISTIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
YOUGH v. ADMINISTRATOR DAVIS et al
as 2:2017cv06366
Plaintiff: STANFORD YOUGH
Defendant: ADMINISTRATOR DAVIS, CINDY FORD, CONNIE O. KARCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?