Cases 1 - 10 of 38
CRAWFORD et al v. THE POPE et al
as 2:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD, JONAH GABRIEL JAH JAH T. TISHBITE, ANTHONY COOK and others
Defendant:
THE POPE, THE VATICAN, THE CATHOLIC ARCH DIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
JACKSON v. DEMASKE et al
as 2:2020cv01226
Defendant:
RICHARDS, CORRECTIONS OFFICER GRIM, LIEUTENANT RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barkley v. Bumgardner et al
as 1:2020cv00214
Defendant:
C.O. Snowberger, C.O. Nepf, C.O. Bumgardner and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Barkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. MAZZOCCA et al
as 2:2019cv00161
Defendant:
THOMAS SUCHTA, DUSTIN POPE, DAVID LINK and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
POPE v. OVERMYER et al
as 3:2019cv00011
Petitioner:
BRIAN POPE
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEDFORD COUNTY, PA, MICHAEL OVERMYER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Talley v. Wetzel, et al
as 3:2018cv00992
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Tammy Ferguson, Rodney Chism, David Link and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talley v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Attorney General's Office, Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. WETZEL, et al
as 2:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, RODNEY CHISM, DAVID LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MAY et al
as 2:2017cv04284
Plaintiff:
KYLIEFF BROWN
Defendant:
MAY, ABELLO, THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
