Cases 1 - 10 of 113
RICE v. KARASTON et al
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
C/O KARASTON, C/O MANTUCE, C/O ANTWON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. INMATE ACCOUNT et al
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
INMATE ACCOUNT, K. DONNELY, N. DELLIPONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carvell Rice v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 23-3063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARVELL RICE
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Kenneth Konias, Jr. v. David Druskin, et al
as 23-2864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH J. KONIAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DRUSKIN, PA-C, KRISTINA TANNER, MICHAEL J. HERBIK, Doctor and others
USA v. Robert Rice
as 23-2221
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT J. RICE
Rice v. USA
as 1:2022cv01548
Petitioner:
Eugene Rice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SMITH v. THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Dashaan R. Smith
Defendant:
The PA Department of Corrections, Superintendent T. Mcginley, LT. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv03530
Plaintiff:
DASHAAN R. SMITH
Defendant:
THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT T. MCGINLEY, LT. RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERMENTER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
RYSHEEN PERMENTER
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBORAH I. CARPENTER, JOHN J. TALABER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RICE v. LAIR et al
as 2:2021cv05261
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
C/O LAIR, LT. MARTIN, C/O BAZEMOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
