Cases 1 - 10 of 33
RODRIGUEZ v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
ANDY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, TIM CARVER and CHRIS MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. WARREN et al
as 3:2020cv05584
Defendant:
NURSE LANCE CARVER, D. SMITH, C. DECRISTI and others
Plaintiff:
MILTON DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NOONAN v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv01049
Plaintiff:
GEORGE NOONAN
Defendant:
NURSE LANCE CARVER, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Monroe County Courthouse et al
as 3:2018cv02396
Defendant:
Sgt Viera, District Attorney E. Davis Christine, Michael Mancuso and others
Plaintiff:
Devine Rose and Steven Love Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGLIAROLI v. AHSAN et al
as 3:2018cv09683
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAGLIAROLI
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN, DONIQUE IVERY, ALEJANDINA SUMICAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TORMASI v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv01203
Plaintiff:
WALTER A. TORMASI
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, MARCUS O. HICKS, MELINDA HALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARVER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06980
Plaintiff:
KEITH CARVER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLMO v. IVERY et al
as 3:2016cv02647
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL J. OLMO
Defendant:
DOMINIQUE IVERY, ABU AHSAN and LANCE CARVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROADWAY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
OMAR BROADWAY
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGH v. IVERY et al
as 3:2016cv02077
Plaintiff:
HARPAL SINGH
Defendant:
DONIQUE IVERY, KIMBERLEE ADAMS, ABU AHSAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
