Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,816
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06864
Plaintiff: KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant: C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Williams v. Jaime Sorber, et al
as 24-2046
Plaintiff: SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant: JAIME SORBER, Former Superintendent of SCI Phoenix, JOHN E. WETZEL, Former Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and GEORGE M. LITTLE, Former Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
COOPER v. LETIZIO et al
as 2:2024cv02463
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant: MEDICAL DIRECTOR LETIZIO, E. CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner: George E. Jones
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Damien Schlager v. John Wetzel
as 24-1900
Plaintiff: DAMIEN M. SCHLAGER
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Department of Corrections (Official and Individual Capacity)
JONES v. DODSON et al
as 1:2024cv06105
Plaintiff: MALIK S. JONES
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER J. DODSON, JAMES HERBERT, JAMES BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALEY v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff: ALEX HAYDN HALEY
Defendant: COUNTY OF CHESTER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL., INC., KAREN MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06010
Plaintiff: KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant: C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00568
Petitioner: William E. Murray
Respondent: Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. James Hocker
as 24-1827
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES E. HOCKER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?