Cases 1 - 10 of 348
Roldan v. Greene
as 3:2024cv00931
Petitioner:
Angel Roldan
Respondent:
Warden J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garza-Guerra v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Garza Guerra
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cooper v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Wendy Nickolas, C.O. Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS v. MCCAULEY
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
ANGEL TERRELL VARGAS, JR.
Defendant:
JOSEPH J. MCCAULEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRES v. CHETIRKIN
as 3:2023cv22350
Petitioner:
ANGEL T. TORRES and NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURK et al v. WELLPATH et al
as 2:2023cv04233
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL ALI BURK, JR., MALIK MORAGNE, GEORGE PICKETT and others
Defendant:
WELLPATH, SCI CHESTER, PAUL LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Woodson, Jr. v. Jodi Sheesley, et al
as 23-2942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN W. WOODSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JODI SHEESLEY, BRIAN SIMONS, ANGEL GRESSEL and others
Julio Ortiz-Lugo v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 23-2808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO ANGEL ORTIZ-LUGO
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
ROSARIO-SANCHEZ v. ESCOBAR-ESCOBAR
as 2:2023cv20740
Plaintiff:
ANGEL I ROSARIO-SANCHEZ
Defendant:
LUIS ADOLFO ESCOBAR-ESCOBAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPICHAK v. PEURIFOY et al
as 2:2023cv03678
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER W. POPICHAK
Defendant:
ANGELE PEURIFOY, WHITNEY LANDIS, JEFFREY ZABAWA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
