Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SMITH v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JENNIFER ANNE PETERSON-BUCK, LINDA H. BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI GREENE F-UNIT MANAGER, SHRADER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2016cv01124
Petitioner:
ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv00313
Petitioner:
ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTHE STAE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2012cv00094
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RICARDO SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN TSOUKARIS and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. HOLDER
as 2:2011cv06987
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RICARDO SMITH
Respondent:
ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2011cv04207
Petitioner:
ANTHONY RICARDO SMITH
Respondent:
JOHN TSOUKARIS, JOHN T. MORTON, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv04312
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TERRELL SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and DENALEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY T. SMITH
Defendant:
NORA BARRY FISCHER and FRANCIS X. CAIAZZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY T. SMITH
Defendant:
NORA BARRY FISCHER and FRANCIS X. CAIAZZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
