Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gregory Obey v. Colley, et al
as 24-1437
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DEVON OBEY
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COLLEY, OFFICER DONOGHUE, MCKEAN FCI HEALTH SERVICE WORKER, ON SHIFT DURING THE DAY OF INCIDENT and others
PRICE v. HUTCHINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
SEAN PRICE
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON, OFFICER NERO and LT BLANKENSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
OBEY v. COLLIE et al.
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DEVON OBEY
Defendant:
OFFICER COLLIE, UNIT MANAGER COLLEY, OFFICER DONOGHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HASBAJRAMI v. BLANKENSHIP
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
AGRON HASBAJRAMI
Defendant:
LT. BLANKENSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. HUTCHISON et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHISON, UDC TEAM OFFICER D. GABRIEL, UDC TEAM OFFICER S. EZZOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Ebbert
as 1:2018cv00954
Plaintiff:
Steven Blankenship
Defendant:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BLANKENSHIP v. PERRY et al
as 1:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ASHLEY BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
THOMAS PERRY and JEFFREY RUDITIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
