Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Wright v. Heishman et al
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Franklin Wright
Defendant:
Heishman, Demby Mucha, Dicampli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HILL et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Defendant:
THORNTON, CT. COLLINS, KYLE MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridge v. Giglio et al
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Luther T. Ridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael A. Giglio, Larry R. Snyder, Jorge E. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOTH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv08953
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. BOOTH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tokyo Gatson v. Benjamin Mininger, et al
as 16-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GATSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BENJAMIN E. MININGER, JORDAN BENSEN, CARLOS MORALES and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JOHN DILKES
GATSON v. MININGER et al
as 2:2015cv08895
Plaintiff:
TOKYO GATSON
Defendant:
BENJAMIN E. MININGER, JORDAN BENSEN, CARLOS MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oreader Callaway, Jr. v. New Jersey State Police, et al
as 15-2089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OREADER CALLAWAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, Troop A Bridgeton Barracks, TPR MCCREEN, WOODSTOWN STATE POLICE, Troop A and others
BRANDON v. CEO ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2014cv05987
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEE BRANDON
Defendant:
CEO ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL and PLYMOLD BOOTHS C.O.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2013cv05493
Plaintiff:
RONALD B. GREENE
Defendant:
MICHAEL PEREZ, THOMAS DOMBROWSKI, ANTHONY MARTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kates v. Packer et al
as 3:2013cv01525
Plaintiff:
David E Kates
Defendant:
Robert Packer, Justin Foura, Steve Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
