Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
BOWEN v. ZAKEN
as 2:2023cv02253
Petitioner:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giddings v. McGinley et al
as 3:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Nelson Giddings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Shawn P. Scicchitano, Lynette Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWEN v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2023cv00956
Petitioner:
NORMAN BOWEN
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWEN v. MONNIE et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BOWEN
Defendant:
DEBORAH ANN MONNIE, PATRICK NOSKO, LUKE VOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv01488
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, ULLI KLEMM, SORBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. Harry et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Petitioner:
Terrell Bowens
Respondent:
Laurel Harry, John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowen v. Warden of Schuylkill County Prison et al
as 1:2021cv01153
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Warden of Schuylkill County Prison and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Petitioner:
Sean Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowens v. McGinley et al
as 2:2021cv02519
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Petitioner:
David Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowens v. McGinley et al
as 3:2021cv00877
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
David Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
