Cases 1 - 10 of 42
BLACKWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00872
Petitioner:
NORMAN BLACKWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 2:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, OFFICER JOHN DOE, DESK SERGEANT JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEILIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
MORGAN NEILIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Sage
as 3:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
Matthew V. Blackwell
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLACKWELL v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BLACKWELL
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, MRS. HUNTLEY and MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKWELL v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET et al
as 2:2021cv04910
Petitioner:
UTIFE BLACKWELL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI SOMERSET, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE GOODE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GUMBS v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2021cv00850
Defendant:
Officer Blackwell and D.K. White
Plaintiff:
Justin J. Gumbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Blackwell et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Respondent:
Dr. Julin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BLACKWELL v. USA
as 2:2021cv00235
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
NORMAN BLACKWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
