Cases 1 - 10 of 55
BLAIN v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00144
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER ALAN BLAIN
Respondent:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WHITLEY v. OVERMYER et al
as 2:2022cv01217
Petitioner:
LAYA WHITLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, BLAINE JONES, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. ESTOCK et al
as 3:2020cv00168
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEE ESTOCK and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
BLAINE V. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GHOLSON v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00175
Defendant:
DAVID CLOSE, PEACE, PAMELA S. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GHOLSON v. ANDREWS et al
as 2:2018cv01632
Defendant:
REBECCA ANDREWS and ZACHARY KENNEDY
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GHOLSON v. SHEEDER et al
as 2:2018cv01451
Defendant:
YOLANDA S. WEBB, LEE J. ESTOCK, FOGLE and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GHOLSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2018cv01412
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GHOLSON v. SHEEDER et al
as 2:2018cv01280
Defendant:
MR. SOKIRA, WHEARY, LEE J. ESTOCK and others
Plaintiff:
BLAINE KOBY GHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gholson v. Sheeder et al
as 1:2018cv01854
Defendant:
Byers, Wheary, Sokira and others
Plaintiff:
Blaine Koby Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. HODGES
as 2:2018cv01152
Defendant:
C/O HODGES
Plaintiff:
BLAINE E. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
