Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00177
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly and Collins Seitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. de Barrena-Sarobe et al
as 1:2021cv01548
Plaintiff:
James R. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher L. de Barrena-Sarobe, David Pugh, Eleni Kousoulis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman-Cabrera v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv17483
Plaintiff:
Jose Francisco Guzman-Cabrera
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERV., U.S. Dist Court, Southern District of New York and others
Palmer v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv11721
Defendant:
CFG MEDICAL SERVICES, PHIL MURPHY, United States Marhals Serv. and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reinaldo v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv10595
Defendant:
U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE, Director of Metropolitan Corr. Center, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
Roman Reinaldo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD et al v. LINARES
as 1:2018cv13459
Plaintiff:
YAHYA MUQUIT and LAWRENCE L. CRAWFORD
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE LINARES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bricker v. Corbett et al
as 1:2010cv01608
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Patrick S. Cawley, Mary Lynch Friedline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
William Rawls v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 09-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, BD PROBATION PAROLE, JEFFREY BEARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
