Cases 1 - 10 of 19
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05268
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID E DESIDERIO, ASS'T. D.A. DAVID WEBB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2020cv01500
Respondent:
Secretary John Wetzel, District Attorney Lawrence Krasner and Superintendent Jamie Sorber
Petitioner:
Christopher Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clemons v. USA
as 1:2016cv00551
Petitioner:
Christopher Williams Clemons
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01260
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Christopher McAdams v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 15-3693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MCADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
MCADAMS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00798
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MCADAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 1:2014cv00395
Plaintiff:
Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Hogue, Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. SWEENY et al
as 2:2014cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MILLER
Defendant:
CINDY SWEENY, PAUL LAGANA, JAMES NWAOGWUGWU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher William
as 13-2318
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Christopher Reed v. Craig Harpster, et al
as 12-3212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM REED
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG HARPSTER, Unit Manager, JEFFERY ROCKOVAN, Grievance Coordinator, JAMES D. MORRIS, Major and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
