Cases 1 - 10 of 140
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00553
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. EVANS et al
as 1:2023cv14173
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W. JONES, II
Defendant:
SCHENETTIA EVANS, HARLIE NELSON, ALISHA GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
COLES v. PROBOLA et al
as 2:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
MINIELBA COLES
Defendant:
NICHOLAS P. PROBOLA and JOHN/JANE DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v Sage et al
as 1:2023cv01203
In Re:
Jim Scott Cole
Plaintiff:
James Scott Alva
Defendant:
Sage, C.O. Derr, Captain Healey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLES v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2023cv03883
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. COLES
Defendant:
RICHARD ANDREWS, AVETTE HARPER and DURANN NEIL, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: JIM SCOTT COLE
as 2:2023cv02606
Plaintiff:
JIM SCOTT COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL
as 2:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
JOYCE COLE
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, MR. FORWELL, MR. FARNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Wellpath et al
as 4:2023cv00282
Defendant:
Wellpath, Correct Care Solutions, LLC (, Marty Cole, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
