Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SLEETS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv04182
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM SLEETS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY, US ARMY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2019cv04826
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Priliszh
as 3:2018cv02446
Defendant:
Justin Priliszh
Plaintiff:
Rashawn David Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLEETS v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv00256
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM SLEETS
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, JAMES P. CULLEN, THE LAW OFFICE OF CLYMER MUSSER & CONRAD P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv01491
Petitioner:
David Williams
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Jim Elder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06612
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLEETS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv00930
Petitioner:
DAVID WILLIAM SLEETS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES P. CULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SLEETS v. SMEAL et al
as 5:2016cv00931
Petitioner:
DAVID WILLIAM SLEETS
Respondent:
PAUL K. SMEAL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. CORZION HEALTH DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv05621
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CORZION HEALTH DEPARTMENT and PHILADELPHIA PRISION SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Williams v. Debra Sauer
as 11-4126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAMS, And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, ANGELO LOPEZ, DANIEL LEE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
