Cases 1 - 10 of 25
WILSON v. BERGEN COUNTY N.J. SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2022cv05272
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant:
BERGEN COUNTY N.J. SHERIFFS OFFICE, BERGEN COUNTY NJ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CHAIRMAN STEVEN TANELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. STRAIGHT AND NARROW DRUG PROGRAM et al
as 2:2021cv06180
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 TO 5 and STRAIGHT AND NARROW DRUG PROGRAM
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. UNION TOWNSHIP POLICE et al
as 2:2021cv04257
Defendant:
UNION TOWNSHIP POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 TO 5 and UNION TOWNSHIP POLICE
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEPE v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2019cv03067
Defendant:
MS. J. WALKER, MS. NOVAK, MS. NEKO BOURNE and others
Plaintiff:
MR. DAVID WILSON PEPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2019cv08639
Defendant:
THOMAS LUTZ, JOHN DOE 1 TO 10 and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv09591
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, GARY LANIGAN, JOHN POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wilson v. James Haas, et al
as 17-1926
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES HAAS, Administrator, ZELLER, CORECTIONAL OFFICER TRULLENDER and others
WILSON v. MIGNELLA
as 3:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant:
ANTHONY MIGNELLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. ESSEX COUNTY JAIL RE-ENTRY PROGRAM et al
as 2:2017cv00694
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY JAIL RE-ENTRY PROGRAM, GREEN, S. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAUTHORN v. WILSON
as 2:2016cv04909
Petitioner:
TROY CAUTHORN
Respondent:
DAVID WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
