Cases 1 - 10 of 21
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
LENTZ v. DILL et al
as 3:2023cv22490
Plaintiff:
TREY LENTZ
Defendant:
RYAN DILL, LOUIS DEDONNO, DAVID SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
ABDU JACKSON
Defendant:
WELLPATH, DR. DAVID SMITH, CRNP LESLIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Scott et al
as 3:2021cv01578
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett
Defendant:
Jeffrey Scott, Correctional Officer French, Emily Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WARDEN SCI FOREST et al
as 1:2021cv00234
Petitioner:
EVAN DAVID SMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN SCI FOREST, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doye v. Bechtold et al
as 3:2021cv01278
Plaintiff:
De'Lano Doye
Defendant:
Bill Bechtold, Michele Weller, Melyssa Flud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2020cv00316
Defendant:
DERECK OBERLANDER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN DAVID SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Pierce et al
as 1:2016cv00996
Petitioner:
David Smith
Respondent:
David Pierce and Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ENTITY et al
as 2:2015cv00931
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ENTITY, MICHAEL NUTTER, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM PPS CFCF CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv02505
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
