Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JARAMILLO v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2018cv00058
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS JARAMILLO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. SENTENCING COMMISSION, U.S.DIRECTOR DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Montez Freeman v. DEA
as 16-2498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTEZ FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
SPENCE v. BALCHON et al
as 2:2016cv00357
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUSSELL SPENCE, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER BALCHON, HERBERT STROBEL and DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Williams v. DEA
as 14-4112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
FREEMAN v. UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
as 2:2014cv01106
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ FREEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2012cv01793
Plaintiff:
RONALD ANDERSON PEARL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, GOSPEL RAP, HIP HOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Humphries v. Mary Houghton, et al
as 11-1784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. HUMPHRIES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY M. HOUGHTON, IN INDIVIDUAL AND PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY, MARIE T. VEON, IN INDIVIDUAL AND PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY, KIMBERLY R. ROGERS, IN INDIVIDUAL AND PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY and others
Tariq Belt v. US Dept Justice, et al
as 10-3167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARIQ BELT
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, BOP BRANCH ALLENWOOD and others
Shawn Wright v. Drug Enforcement Agency
as 09-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, CALVIN EVANS, JOHN LENEHAN and others
Akhil Bansal v. Eric Russ, et al
as 08-2942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKHIL BANSAL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLOS AQUINO, ATTY GEN USA, DAVE BOLE and others
Defendant:
STEVE HORNESS, RONALD KHAN, TUSHAR VAISHNAV and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
