Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Harkins v. Wapinsky et al
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gage A. Harkins
Defendant:
David Wapinsky and C.O. Matthew Donnelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEYWARD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00530
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, HOMICIDE DET. JOHN HARKINS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HEYWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEWALD et al v. HILLER et al
as 2:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. DEWALD, II, KRIS PYLANT, DAMIEN CAMMILE and others
Defendant:
MARK HILLER, DAVID BYRNE and COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBBS v. THE PHILA. POLICE DEPARMENT et al
as 2:2016cv05465
Plaintiff:
AMIN H. GIBBS
Defendant:
JAMES BURNS, JOHN KREWER, DONALD MARANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOYLE v. BATTEN et al
as 1:2015cv02916
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE HOYLE
Defendant:
RAYMOND A. BATTEN, SAVERIO M. CARROCCIA, DOUG OSMANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yuwsha Alwan v. Pamela Dembe, et al
as 14-4030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YUWSHA ALWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA P. DEMBE, LILLIAN HARRIS RANSOM, PATRICK F. DUGAN and others
ALWAN v. DEMBE et al
as 2:2014cv04001
Plaintiff:
YUWSHA ALWAN
Defendant:
PAMELA P. DEMBE, LILLIAN H. RANSOM, PATRICK F. DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damian Black Fox
Defendant:
FCI Fort Dix Food Services Department West Compound, Dougless Williams, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
