Cases 1 - 10 of 19
JOHNSON v. USA et al
as 2:2019cv01129
Defendant:
AGENT BLACK OH, CHEIF POLICE OF BRADDOCK, BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kelley v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2019cv00688
Respondent:
State of Delaware and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Petitioner:
Ivorie Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAGLIAROLI v. AHSAN et al
as 3:2018cv12412
Defendant:
SCO D. BOONE, PROVIDER JAMES BREWIN, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PAGLIAROLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMBERT v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2018cv00293
Petitioner:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Respondent:
CAPOZZA, MARGARET IVORY and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IVORY v. SMITH et al
as 3:2016cv00269
Petitioner:
MARK IVORY
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CAMBRIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, ROBERT E. COLVILLE, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALLA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMEN, DARRELL O. DUGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Ebbert
as 4:2015cv02133
Petitioner:
Andre Ivory
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOSEPHS v. N.J. DOC. MAJOR SANDERSON et al
as 3:2015cv02536
Plaintiff:
HUGH JOSEPHS, JR.
Defendant:
N.J. DOC. MAJOR SANDERSON, NURSE IVORY, SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VILLEGAS v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, et al
as 2:2014cv07337
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO VILLEGAS
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE, INC., RALPH WOODWARD, M.D., ABU AHSAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
