Cases 1 - 10 of 34
John Alexander v. B. Myers, et al
as 24-1239
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
B. MYERS, Corrections Lieutenant- SCI Smithfield, SPECK, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield, WISER, Corrections Lieutenant SCI-Smithfield and others
Alexander v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
John Alexander
Defendant:
B. Myers, E. Speck, D. Wiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. BURLINGTON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2018cv00431
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerome Washington v. George Ondrejka, et al
as 18-1026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE ONDREJKA, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
George Taylor, III v. Superintendent Waymart SCI, et al
as 17-3081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE J. TAYLOR, III
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE
TAYLOR v. SOMMERS et al
as 2:2017cv02621
Petitioner:
GEORGE J. TAYLOR, III
Respondent:
JACK SOMMERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALMORE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv08118
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALMORE, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID OWENS, J. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 1:2016cv07677
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BLACKSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, DAVID OWENS and J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07690
Plaintiff:
AARON W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, JAMES OWEN, J. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMBY v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv07426
Plaintiff:
RONALD DEMBY
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS and J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
