Cases 1 - 10 of 21
JOHNSON v. HILL et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Defendant:
THORNTON, CT. COLLINS, KYLE MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX et al
as 1:2020cv16013
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. WARDEN, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, ET AL
as 2:2020cv00775
Respondent:
WARDEN, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON, WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTS and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Petitioner:
JORDAN JAMES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. WALTON et al
as 2:2020cv00621
Plaintiff:
JORDAN JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTS, JOHN R. WALTON, GEORGE LOWTHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2018cv04651
Defendant:
H.S.A., JOSEPH LYNCH, LT. REBECCA PERKINS and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY JAMES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Carney et al
as 1:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Oscar Martinez
Defendant:
John Carney, Matthew Denn, Brendan O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2016cv04799
Plaintiff:
AARON JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
KYLE RUSSELL, FRANCO TASSONE, MICHAEL WHALEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. TICE et al
as 2:2016cv03863
Petitioner:
JAMES JOHNSON
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON et al v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2016cv02488
Plaintiff:
AARON JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
JANINE QUIGLEY, JEFFREY SMITH, JEFFREY SHEARER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. QUIGLEY et al
as 5:2016cv01215
Plaintiff:
AARON JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
JANINE QUIGLEY, MARCIE GILMOUR, GEORGE BYERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
