Cases 1 - 10 of 183
DIGGS v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv04827
Defendant:
WARDEN OF B.C.C.F., JOHN DOE #2,, OFC. F. WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN J. DIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLIMON v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 2, JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 4 and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT HOLLIMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DYKEMAN v. FISHER et al
as 1:2024cv07358
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #3, R. BLIZZARD, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DYKEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. AINSLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Defendant:
C.O. PERKINS, C.O. JOHN DOE 3, C.O. KNIZER and others
Plaintiff:
JALIL S. REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tomlin v. Smolke et al
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tomlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Smolke, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEON LUBIEJEWSKI, JAMES MCNESBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLMES v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
WINDEL HOLMES
Defendant:
WELLPATH, RNS BRAD AVENALI, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
John Rivello, Captain Long, Lieutenant Yonkers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
