Cases 1 - 10 of 457
ROBINSON v. HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
TRAY ROBINSON
Defendant:
HENDERSON, LOVE, KOSHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
NELSON v. LAUREL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY HARRY LAUREL, JORGE DOMINICIS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGINNIS v. HILL et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
VERN E. MCGINNIS, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE KAREN HILL, CHCA JANA JORDAN, NURSE KATE HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. BAZEL et al
as 2:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Defendant:
DR. SEED BAZEL and REGISTERED NURSE ANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Barves et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
J. Barves, J. Pumphrey, Lt. Bardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
Concepcion v. Reed et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jordan Concepcion
Defendant:
Lt. C.O. III Reed, Lt. C.O. II Marshall, C.O. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWLING v. LEHIGH COUNTY et al
as 5:2023cv04897
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BOWLING
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY, KYLE RUSSELL, SGT. GONZALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
