Cases 1 - 10 of 200
JOHNSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSHUA TERRA, CO1 ALEX, CO2 PISTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Plaintiff:
LEONARD YOUNG
Defendant:
SGT GREENE, C.O. LANE, COUNSELOR J MUPRHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Lane v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 23-2483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
William Curtis v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Commissioner Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, J. BIRMINGHAM, PSS, T. BOLTON, PSS and others
Defendant:
STEWART, LAUREL R. HARRY, Department of Corrections Secretary, FRANCIS J. FEILD, PSS and others
Travis Lane v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 23-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
GUILLE v. KUHN et al
as 3:2023cv02138
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN GUILLE
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, JOHN FALVEY, BRUCE DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WASHINGTON v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 1:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
JAMALL WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LANE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. Seilus
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
CARL LANE
Defendant:
Joseph Seilus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON v. LANE et al
as 1:2022cv07015
Plaintiff:
JAMALL WASHINGTON
Defendant:
C.O. LANE, SGT. YACOB and INMATE NAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: CARLTON LANE
as 2:2022cv01812
Petitioner:
CARLTON LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
