Cases 1 - 10 of 16
JOHNSON v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 2:2022cv01320
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: JOHNSON
as 2:2022cv03402
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2022cv00883
Petitioner:
JUSTIN LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
KYLE RUSSELL, DAVID J. MUSSELL, KERRY TURTZO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JOHNSON v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON BOARD et al
as 2:2020cv01937
Defendant:
LT. STEVEN M. PELESKY, WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON BOARD, GEORGE LOWTHER and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2020cv01092
Petitioner:
RONALD LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN R. WALTON and WESTMORELAND COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Ebbert
as 3:2015cv01284
Petitioner:
Dustin Lee Johnson
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. D'ILIO et al
as 3:2015cv03197
Petitioner:
LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2015cv03197
Petitioner:
LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2011cv04555
Petitioner:
JERRY LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA L. KELLY PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCREADY v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2010cv01137
Plaintiff:
CARLTON MCCREADY
Defendant:
LEE JOHNSON, TODD ROBINSON, LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
