Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MCCLORIN v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY
as 2:2018cv01464
Plaintiff:
MARQUES GREGORY MCCLORIN
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07535
Plaintiff:
MARQUES T. SMITH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03397
Plaintiff:
MARQUES REAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watkins v. Thomas
as 1:2013cv00919
Petitioner:
Marques DeWayne Watkins
Respondent:
Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPURGEON v. THE NJ STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2012cv03352
Plaintiff:
DAVID SPURGEON
Defendant:
THE NJ STATE POLICE, THE KEARNY NJ POLICE, THE JERSEY CITY POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David W. Ogden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick Foster v. Jeffrey Raleigh, et al
as 11-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK L. FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY RALEIGH, JERRY MARTINEZ, A.D. TOLLACKSON and others
Foster v. Raleigh et al
as 3:2010cv01804
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Foster
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. Raleigh, Jerry C. Martinez, A. D. Tollackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROCTOR v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2010cv03878
Plaintiff:
SHARIF R. PROCTOR
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM MEDICAL STAFF EMPLOYEES, CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Parker et al
as 1:2010cv00809
Plaintiff:
Kevin Arthur Brown
Defendant:
NFN Parker, NFN Prater, Rick Marques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
