Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Bowman v. Mosely et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowman
Defendant:
Detective Marlena Mosely, City of Philadelphia, Detective Dennis Dusack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. HAMLETT et al
as 2:2023cv15723
Plaintiff:
SAHDIEKHAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
CELESTE HAMLETT, MONICA TYSON, SHALAA CURETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas, Jr. v. SCI-Smithfield Mental Health et al
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Eddie C. Lucas, Jr.
Defendant:
SCI-Smithfield Mental Health, SCI-Smithfield Parole Department, Nurse Fawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy Moses v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 23-1403
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY MOSES
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI
Moses Clary v. USA
as 23-1211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOSES CLARY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HARRIS v. COLE et al
as 5:2022cv05147
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARRIS
Defendant:
AMY COLE, MOSES MARTINEZ, ERIC S. PENNYPACKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quintez Talley v. Glessner, et al
as 22-3307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. JOSHUA GLESSNER, SGT. MOSES, C/O SMITH and others
MCGILLVARY v. RIEZ et al
as 3:2022cv06430
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
RONALD RIEZ, SAMUAL LOPEZ, JOEL BERNHARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSES v. SORBER et al
as 2:2022cv03385
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ROY MOSES
Defendant:
JAMIE SORBER, DEPUTY SIPPLE, DR. BAZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSES v. PATRICK GECKLE, ESQ.
as 2:2022cv03027
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MOSES and SHAWN MOSS
Defendant:
PATRICK GECKLE, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
