Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HERBERT v. ASSOCIATE WARDEN et al
as 2:2023cv21377
Plaintiff:
OLAJUWON HERBERT
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN, WARDEN, REGINA MARROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARROW v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv02296
Plaintiff:
VONTRA MARROW
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marrow v. Spaulding
as 1:2021cv01104
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Petitioner:
Raheem Marrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marrow v. Lawler et al
as 1:2019cv01690
Defendant:
Mrs. Granuland, Rose A. McKinney, Mrs. Susan Wolfe and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Marrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrow v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv00931
Plaintiff:
Tracy Marrow
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania , PA Department of Corrections , Correctional Officer John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealy v. Keen et al
as 3:2013cv02781
Plaintiff:
Vernon L. Ealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen, Russell R. Rouzer, Michelle Weller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARROW v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2013cv04777
Petitioner:
TRACY MARROW
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tracy Marrow v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-2605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY MARROW
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, MR., COMMISSIONER, PPS and JOHN DELANEY, WARDEN, CFCF
MARROW v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv03171
Plaintiff:
TRACY MARROW
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES RAMSEY, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARROW v. PHILADELPHIA CURRAN AND FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2010cv02053
Plaintiff:
TRACY MARROW
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CURRAN AND FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and LOUIS GIORLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
