Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MAYES v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv04780
Petitioner:
NORMAN MAYES
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAYES v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv12151
Defendant:
JANE DOE NURSE 2, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICER BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MAYES
3Rd Party Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maye v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants in Security at SCI Dallas, Captain Myer, Lieutenant Stark and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYES v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2020cv05351
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Petitioner:
ALCHANE MAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALLEY v. SANDUSKY et al
as 3:2019cv00183
Defendant:
ANY/ALL JOHN AND JANE DOES, JOHN WETZEL, C.O. GERBER and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BENNETT v. BANKS et al
as 2:2018cv04372
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BANKS, SERGEANT JOHN DOE, WARDEN JOHN DELANY and others
Plaintiff:
HASSAN BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. MAYES
as 2:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
COREY TAYLOR
Defendant:
GERALD MAYES and CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans-Mayes v. Metzer et al
as 1:2017cv01814
Petitioner:
Tyreek Evans-Mayes
Respondent:
Dana Metzer and Attorney General for the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWS v. MAYE et al
as 2:2016cv01614
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE LAWS
Defendant:
MAYE, MICHAEL RESNICK and KENNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Beard et al
as 1:2013cv02952
Plaintiff:
Eric Lyons
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Michael Klopotoski, Jerome Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
