Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MOLLIVER v. TATE et al
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHN TRAVIS MOLLIVER
Defendant:
ABBIE TATTE, ZACHARY STITT, NATE PORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ZAMICHIELI v. MIHAL et al
as 3:2021cv01246
Plaintiff:
Lamont Zamichieli
Defendant:
Betty Lou Mihal, Trojan, Lt. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAMICHIELI v. MIHAL et al
as 2:2021cv03066
Plaintiff:
LAMONT ZAMICHIELI
Defendant:
BETTY LOU MIHAL, SGT. TROJAN, C/OI ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Lycoming County Prison et al
as 1:2021cv00781
Defendant:
Nate Edler, Chase Willard, Lt. Harry Entz and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FENNELL et al v. PENCHISHEN et al
as 5:2019cv00111
Plaintiff:
TERRELL BERKLEY, KENNETH SERNOBLE, GABRIEL LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GOLDY, LIEUTENANT HENNINGER, CAPTAIN MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT (M.D.PA.) et al
as 5:2018cv05277
Defendant:
THOMAS DARR, PENNSYLVANIA SUPREM COURT (E.D.PA.), C.J. THOMAS SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MITCHELL, ANTHONY LYONS, AESHA LYONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2018cv00998
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
PAROLE AGENT TAWNYA PEEK, NATE SIMON, PATRICIA VALAURI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
USA v. Nathan Mosley
as 17-2298
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NATHAN MOSLEY, a/k/a Nate
BLAIR v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2014cv01207
Plaintiff:
MONTE D. BLAIR
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE, REGINA MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
