Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JACKSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01396
Petitioner:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. HARPER
as 2:2023cv01353
Petitioner:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JACKSON v. BAYIKEIFER et al
as 2:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
JASON BAYIKEFFER, MAJOR EDWARDS, CAPTAIN BOSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
MAJOR EDWARDS, MAJOR BAIKEIFFER, CAPT BOSI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BRICKMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
A. BRICKMAN, SARAH K., HOLLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
CHIEF DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, MAJOR ADAM SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JACKSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv01335
Defendant:
MAUREEN MCGRAW-DESMET, CAPT FRANK, C/O RAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kenneth Jackson v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 16-1230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH P. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Kenneth Jackson v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 15-4034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH P. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
JACKSON v. CAMERON, et al
as 3:2014cv00077
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
CAMERON, HOLLINBAUGH, CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
