Cases 1 - 10 of 26
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. FCI SCHUYLKILL
as 1:2023cv00325
Petitioner:
Tammond Hill
Respondent:
FCI Schuylkill
Arbitrator:
Pro Se Law Clerks plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DRINKMAN v. FCI ALLENWOOD
as 3:2022cv00691
Petitioner:
VLADIMIR DRINKMAN
Respondent:
FCI Allenwood
Arbitrator:
Pro Se Law Clerks plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TRIPATI v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00427
Defendant:
KRISTIN WHITNEY BASHA, LUCY M. RAUD, NICHOLAS D. ALEDO and others
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Collado v. Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2020cv03719
Receiver:
PLC
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Petitioner:
David Collado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SONNIE v. ATLANTIC COUNTY COURT et al
as 1:2020cv00970
Defendant:
DELURY TAYLOR, JUDGE SANDSON, JUDGE WILD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRUILL v. WARDEN, FPCC
as 1:2019cv01845
Respondent:
Warden, FPCC
Arbitrator:
Pro Se Law Clerks plc
Petitioner:
Anthony Spruill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv08458
Plaintiff:
MAURICE C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and plc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMENT v. HAUCK et al
as 3:2012cv05234
Petitioner:
COURTNEY CLEMENT
Respondent:
WILLIAM HAUCK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLAGER v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv07553
Plaintiff:
TIWAN FLAGER
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, PARKS, DR., DR.(un-named) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
