Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Alfredo Martinez-Perez v. Gina Clark, et al
as 24-1672
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO MARTINEZ-PEREZ
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, Superintendent - SCI Chester, M QUINN, Grievance Coordinator - SCI Chester and DR. PAUL G. LITTLE, Doctor - SCI Chester
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 2:2023cv03972
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, M QUINN and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. FLOYD et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN FLOYD, LIEUTENANT STAFFORD, JAMES BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
Gina Clark, M. Quinn and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERRE v. BATES
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
MACARTON N. PIERRE
Defendant:
SGT. BRIAN BATES, MELISSA GIROUX, LT. PARTCHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURK v. QUINN et al
as 2:2023cv03004
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Defendant:
MS. QUINN, AGENT MS. JAMES, SUPERVISOR MS. JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUERTAS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
HECTOR HUERTAS
Defendant:
GINA CLARK and MADELINE QUINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: RYAN QUINN SHOWALTER
as 5:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
RYAN QUINN SHOWALTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KITTRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDRE KITTRELL
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, LIEUTENANT OLIVER, JEFF MEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
