Cases 1 - 10 of 729
ROBINSON v. HENDERSON et al
as 2:2024cv02599
Plaintiff:
TRAY ROBINSON
Defendant:
HENDERSON, LOVE, KOSHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: JERRELL ROBINSON
as 2:2024cv01509
Plaintiff:
JERRELL ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv04598
Plaintiff:
JACOB TIMOTHY GARRETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS N.J.D.O.C., NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Dupree Williams
Defendant:
Gregory Briggz, C.O. Robinson, Savasia Caraballo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victor Thomas v. Martynuska, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant:
R.N. MARTYNUSKA, Medical Contractor, FCI Loretto, NORMAN WEIDLICH, Health Care Administrator, FCI Loretto, M.D. KIM SWINDELL and others
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 2:2024cv01813
Plaintiff:
DUPREE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GREGORY BRIGGZ, C.O. ROBINSON, SAVASIA CARABALLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
ROBINSON v. WAHL et al
as 2:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
FARUQ ROBINSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wayne Johnson v. May, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff:
WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN MAY, NURSE ROBINSON, NURSE BYRD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
