Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Fernando Real v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 23-1543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FERNANDO REAL
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
REAL v. HOUSER, et al.
as 2:2022cv04812
Petitioner:
FERNANDO REAL
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, HOUSER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHIL. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS V. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST, ETAL
as 2:2022cv02280
Plaintiff:
JAMMAL S. WILLIAMS and JAHMAL S. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
REAL PARTY IN INTEREST, ETAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIDRIGUEZ v. ATTAS et al
as 2:2021cv05440
Plaintiff:
JOHN RIDRIGUEZ
Defendant:
MOSHE ATTAS, IVRY INVESTMENT, LLC. and GIOVANNI REAL ESTATE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv04128
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SPAGNOLETTI, SC TURNAGE and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO REAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAL v. LINK et al
as 2:2016cv00034
Petitioner:
FERNANDO REAL
Respondent:
LINK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REAL v. GILSON et al
as 2:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO REAL
Defendant:
MARK GILSON, GAL FAIRMAN, DOMINIC MAGONI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernando Real v. Dunkle, et al
as 15-1018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO REAL
Defendant - Appellee:
DUNKLE, LT. MALIK, Doctor, SGT. CLARK and others
Real v. Huber et al
as 3:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
Fernando Real
Defendant:
Huber, Richard Southers, Michael Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCE v. CAPUTO et al
as 2:2012cv01077
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUSSELL SPENCE, JR.
Defendant:
LOUIS CAPUTO, WILLIAM DIFENDERFER, MARK D. LANCASTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
