Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lewis v. Metzger et al
as 1:2018cv01226
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Lewis
Defendant:
Dana Metzger, Department of Justice and State Of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. FRIMEL et al
as 2:2018cv01124
Plaintiff:
CARL DWAYNE CRAWFORD
Defendant:
EDWARD M. FRIMEL, VITO D. ROSELLI, RICHARD B. MARX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv03737
Petitioner:
RICHARD B. JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GIEHL v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2015cv07864
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. GIEHL
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, BETTIE HARRIS, ADMINISTRATOR JOHN/JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Moneyham v. Richard B. Ives
as 3:2015cv01551
Petitioner:
Anthony Moneyham
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carl Crawford v. Vito Roselli, et al
as 15-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
VITO D. ROSELLI, RICHARD B. MARX and THOMAS SCANZANO, individually and in their official capacities
CRAWFORD v. ROSELLI et al
as 2:2013cv05088
Plaintiff:
CARL DAWYNE CRAWFORD
Defendant:
VITO D. ROSELLI, RICHARD B. MARX and THOMAS SCANZANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. ROSELLI et al
as 2:2013cv03366
Plaintiff:
CARL CRAWFORD
Defendant:
VITO D. ROSELLI, RICHARD B. MARX and THOMAS SCANZANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gavin et al
as 3:2011cv01399
Petitioner:
Richard B Williams
Respondent:
Wayne J. Gavin , Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHES v. BUSH et al
as 2:2006cv01055
Defendant:
USAMA BIN LADEN, SHADY RECORDS INC, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Petitioner:
DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH and PATRICK J. SIMPSON
Not Yet Classified:
M. C. HAMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
