Cases 1 - 10 of 12
GRANVILLE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv01964
Petitioner:
ROHAN GRANVILLE
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rohan Walters v. Warden Fairton FCI
as 16-3177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROHAN WALTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN FAIRTON FCI
WALTERS v. KIRBY
as 1:2016cv01480
Petitioner:
ROHAN WALTERS
Respondent:
MARK KIRBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HYLTON v. GREEN et al
as 2:2015cv06434
Petitioner:
ROHAN HYLTON
Respondent:
CHARLES GREEN , JOHN TSOUKARIS , JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Kron et al
as 1:2014cv01377
Petitioner:
Rohan Johnson
Respondent:
Barry Kron, Gloria Pellegrino, Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DALEY v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
ROHAN ONEIL DALEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLAKE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv03981
Plaintiff:
ROHAN BLAKE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYTEM et al
as 2:2013cv02123
Plaintiff:
ROHAN BLAKE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYTEM, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv07315
Petitioner:
ROHAN G. R. WILSON
Respondent:
ROY L. HENDRICKS , JOHN TSOUKARIS , JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KEATING v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv01639
Petitioner:
ROHAN KEATING
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ROY L. HENDRICKS and JOHN TSOUKARIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
